RetroSearch Browse

Wed Feb 16 14:33:28 CET 2005 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2005-February/051589.html

Nick Rasmussen <nick at ilm.com> writes:

[five days ago]

> Should boost::python functions be modified in some way to show
> up as builtin function types or is the right fix really to patch
> pydoc?

My heart leans towards the latter.

> Is PyCFunction_Type intended to be subclassable?

Doesn't look like it, does it? :) More seriosly, "no".

Cheers,
mwh

-- 
  ARTHUR:  Don't ask me how it works or I'll start to whimper.
                   -- The Hitch-Hikers Guide to the Galaxy, Episode 11

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2005-February/051589.html below:

[Python-Dev] subclassing PyCFunction_Type