A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2005-February/051569.html below:

[Python-Dev] pymalloc on 2.1.3

[Python-Dev] pymalloc on 2.1.3 [Python-Dev] pymalloc on 2.1.3Michael Hudson mwh at python.net
Tue Feb 15 13:58:19 CET 2005
"Fredrik Lundh" <fredrik at pythonware.com> writes:

> does anyone remember if there were any big changes in pymalloc between
> the 2.1 series (where it was introduced) and 2.3 (where it was enabled by
> default).

Yes.  (Was it really 2.1?  Time flies!)

> or in other words, is the 2.1.3 pymalloc stable enough for production use?

Well, Tim posted ways of making it crash, but I don't know how likely
they are to occur in non-malicious code.

"cvs log Objects/obmalloc.c" might enlighten, or at least give an idea
which months of the python-dev archive to search.

Cheers,
mwh

-- 
  <Aardappel> this "I hate c++" is so old
  <dash> it's as old as C++, yes
                                                -- from Twisted.Quotes
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4