RetroSearch Browse

Mon Feb 14 17:33:13 CET 2005 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2005-February/051561.html

On Feb 14, 2005, at 10:41 AM, Tim Peters wrote:

>> Wouldn't it be more elegant to make builtin_id() return an unsigned
>> long integer?
>
> I think so.  This is the function ZODB 3.3 uses, BTW:
>
> def positive_id(obj):
>     """Return id(obj) as a non-negative integer."""
>  [...]

I think it'd be nice to change it, too. Twisted also uses a similar 
function.

However, last time this topic came up, this Tim Peters guy argued 
against it. ;)

Quoting 
http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2004-November/050049.html:

> Python doesn't promise to return a postive integer for id(), although
> it may have been nicer if it did.  It's dangerous to change that now,
> because some code does depend on the "32 bit-ness as a signed integer"
> accident of CPython's id() implementation on 32-bit machines.  For
> example, code using struct.pack(), or code using one of ZODB's
> specialized int-key BTree types with id's as keys.

James

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2005-February/051561.html below:

[Python-Dev] builtin_id() returns negative numbers