On Thu, 10 Feb 2005 15:32:14 -0500, Fred L. Drake, Jr. <fdrake at acm.org> wrote: > On Thursday 10 February 2005 14:44, Tim Peters wrote: > > Well, then since that isn't ISO 8601 format, it would be nice to have > > a comment explaining why it's claiming to be anyway <0.5 wink>. > > I've posted a note on the XML-RPC list about this. There doesn't seem to be > anything that describes the range of what's accepted and produced by the > various XML-RPC libraries, but I've not looked hard for it. Is there any surprise here? =)
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4