"Phillip J. Eby" <pje at telecommunity.com> writes: > At 08:20 PM 2/9/05 +0100, BJörn Lindqvist wrote: >>Does Skip's idea have >>any merit? > > Yes, but not as a default behavior. Many people already consider the > fact that tracebacks display file paths to be a potential security > problem. If anything, the default traceback display should have less > information, not more. (E.g., display module __name__ instead of the > code's __file__). Oh, come on. Making tracebacks less useful to protect people who accidentally spray them across the internet seems absurd. Would you like them not to show source, either? Cheers, mwh -- Many of the posts you see on Usenet are actually from moths. You can tell which posters they are by their attraction to the flames. -- Internet Oracularity #1279-06
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4