A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2005-December/059308.html below:

[Python-Dev] [Doc-SIG] that library reference, again

[Python-Dev] [Doc-SIG] that library reference, again [Python-Dev] [Doc-SIG] that library reference, againRobey Pointer robey at lag.net
Fri Dec 30 07:36:40 CET 2005
On 29 Dec 2005, at 18:58, David Goodger wrote:

> [Fredrik Lundh]
>>>> I'm beginning to fear that I've wasted my time on a project
>>>> that nobody's interested in.
>
> [David Goodger]
>>> Could be. I don't see HTML+PythonDoc as a significant improvement
>>> over LaTeX.
>
> [Fredrik Lundh]
>> Really?
>
> Yes, really.

Just out of curiosity (really -- not trying to jump into the flames)  
why not just use epydoc?  If it's good enough for 3rd-party python  
libraries, isn't that just a small step from being good enough for  
the builtin libraries?

robey

More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4