Hello,
If I do something like this:
s = set()
for i in xrange(1000000):
s.add(i)
while s:
s.pop()
gc.collect()
the memory consumption of the process remains the same even after the pops.
I checked the code (that's where I started from, really), and there's
nothing in set.pop or set.remove that resizes the table. And it turns
out that it's the same with dicts.
Should something be done about it?
Noam
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4