Torsten Bronger wrote: > > [...] Are there any HTML-to-print converters that are better? > > I don't understand exactly how the HTML is to be used for Python but > I assume that not everything could be done via CSS, so own > converters will be necessary for perfect output. If done right, it should be possible to get a "usable" rendering from the raw HTML+microformat file, but a real online version would of course need some preprocessing (e.g basic templating and navigation fixup). Not more than you could do on the fly, or in a simple cgi script... For publication work, you need more preprocessing, of course (but I'm not sure the typical python user cares much about the subtle differences be- tween latex and openoffice/word formatting...) > I was disappointed with its rather small semantic vocabulary. I sometimes doubt that the rest proponents understand the phrase "semantic vocabulary". They do sound a lot like Perl proponents, though... (and strangely enough, there seems to be an almost perfect inverse relation- ship between the ReST zealousness and the amount of text and code they have contributed to the core distribution. oh well.) </F>
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4