Fredrik Lundh wrote: >>Maybe it's just because I came in late on this thread, but what exactly >>is broken about the current LaTeX documentation? > > > Checked the python-list archives lately? If you google c.l.python for the > word "documentation", you'll find recent megathreads with subjects like > "bitching about the documentation", "opensource documentation problems" > and "python documentation should be better" among the top hits. But if > you check the bug and patch trackers, you don't find many contributions. > Something's definitely broken. This is somewhat tangential to this discussion, but I did have the Python documentation in mind as a potential future target for Commentary: http://pythonpaste.org/comment/commentary/ -- which would allow more casual contributions that seem to work well for other projects. -- Ian Bicking | ianb at colorstudy.com | http://blog.ianbicking.org
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4