On Wed, 2005-12-21 at 20:36 +0100, Fredrik Lundh wrote: > I'm not really interested in optimizing for you, I'm interested in optimizing > for everyone else. They already know HTML. They don't know ReST, and > I doubt they care about it (how many blogs accept ReST for comments?) Sorry, but HTML and (even more so) XML are not human-writable. :) Yeah, we can all do the simple stuff, but I absolutely hate authoring in HTML, and it would be a nightmare if the documentation production system didn't handle lots and lots of magic for you (like weaving in the right footers, css, etc. -- oh wait, that's ht2html!). reST is a fine language but it seems more suitable to simpler linear documents like wiki pages and PEPs, rather than those with complicated nested structure. Maybe it's just because I came in late on this thread, but what exactly is broken about the current LaTeX documentation? -Barry -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 307 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part Url : http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20051221/2ad4a68d/attachment.pgp
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4