On Wed, Dec 21, 2005 at 05:10:24PM +0100, Fredrik Lundh wrote: > (as I hinted, I'd prefer HTML with microformat annotations as the > main format; with roundtripping to markdown or rest (etc) for people > who prefer to author in that, and tidy->xhtml->python tools for the > HTML generation) I don't see how HTML can be used to support printed versions of the docs (e.g. PostScript, PDF). Even if you generated one big HTML file instead of a zillion section-by-section files, web browsers are terrible at printing. I don't know how you could get a table of contents that refers you to the actual pages, for example. Are there any HTML-to-print converters that are better? reST is a possibility, though I don't think anyone has worked on building the required toolchain. Fred has a LaTeX-to-XML-format converter kicking around somewhere, but the toolchain has never gotten good enough to permit making that final transition. --amk
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4