RetroSearch Browse

Tue Dec 20 02:37:06 CET 2005 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2005-December/058904.html

Jim Jewett wrote:
 > Or, at the very least, promote a
> *standard* way to say "just get me a canonical ordering of some sort"

That would be my preference. Comparison for canonical
ordering should be a distinct operation with its
own spelling. Then Guido's

>         Comparisons other than == and != between disparate types will raise an
>         exception unless explicitly supported by the type

can be true without precluding the existence of a
canonical ordering.

-- 
Greg Ewing, Computer Science Dept, +--------------------------------------+
University of Canterbury,	   | A citizen of NewZealandCorp, a	  |
Christchurch, New Zealand	   | wholly-owned subsidiary of USA Inc.  |
greg.ewing at canterbury.ac.nz	   +--------------------------------------+

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2005-December/058904.html below:

[Python-Dev] Keep default comparisons - or add a second set?