A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2005-December/058824.html below:

[Python-Dev] Location of .so files (Was: Sharing expat instances)

[Python-Dev] Location of .so files (Was: Sharing expat instances) [Python-Dev] Location of .so files (Was: Sharing expat instances)"Martin v. Löwis" martin at v.loewis.de
Thu Dec 15 22:14:17 CET 2005
Phillip J. Eby wrote:
> Right; the question is why not just EXEC_PREFIX "/lib/python" VERSION
>  instead.  What benefit does the separate directory offer?

I can only guess: it's primarily a matter of tidiness.

> Note that the distutils, when installing a package containing C
> extensions, will install to site-packages under sys.exec_prefix; it
> does not separate the C extensions into special alternate library
> directories.

Yes, that's inconsistent. One way to make it consistent would be to
honor lib-dynload; the other to get rid of lib-dynload. I cannot see
how one of these option is better than the other (nor can I see
what the relevance for the expat discussion is, so I changed the
subject).

Regards,
Martin

More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4