On 12/13/05, "Martin v. Löwis" <martin at v.loewis.de> wrote: > > Fredrik Lundh wrote: > > BTW, what's the policy wrt. Jython-specific modules in the standard > library? > > I don't think there is enough precedence to have a policy. So far, the > only places that explicitly support Jython is the test suite, pickle, > and platform (I wouldn't really count in site here). > Actually there's some Jython-specific code in xml/sax/__init__.py. Two places, both questionable. One of them refers to sys.registry. The other appears to be a workaround for Jython not having 4-argument __import__. > If the portability problem can be solved by checking things into Jython > instead, I think I would prefer that. Yes, it can be solved that way: Jython could implement pyexpat. I don't know just how crazy that idea is; my impression is that it could be done, perhaps imperfectly, as a wrapper around SAX. -j -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20051213/6310398a/attachment.html
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4