A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2005-December/058589.html below:

[Python-Dev] ElementTree - Why not part of the core? (fwd)

[Python-Dev] ElementTree - Why not part of the core? (fwd) [Python-Dev] ElementTree - Why not part of the core? (fwd)Steve Holden steve at holdenweb.com
Mon Dec 12 13:39:08 CET 2005
Hye-Shik Chang wrote:
> On 12/12/05, Fredrik Lundh <fredrik at pythonware.com> wrote:
> 
>>Fredrik Lundh wrote:
>>
>>
>>>just one question: where do you want [to put] the "vendor" checkins ?  I'm using
>>>a flat "kits" namespace in my own repositories, e.g.
>>
>>>anyone has a better name?
>>
>>anyone ?
>>
> 
> 
> I think "contrib" is somewhat conventional for the purpose.
> 
Indeed, but conventionally *all* code in the Python core is contributed, 
and I think we need a name that differentiates externally-maintained 
packages from the contributions that are integrated into the core and 
maintained as part of it.

regards
  Steve
-- 
Steve Holden       +44 150 684 7255  +1 800 494 3119
Holden Web LLC                     www.holdenweb.com
PyCon TX 2006                  www.python.org/pycon/

More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4