On 12/7/05, Raymond Hettinger <raymond.hettinger at verizon.net> wrote: > Are there any generator specific needs that are not met by the PEP 342 > implementation? Given a choice between throw(), close(), and send(), I > would have thought that all the bases have been covered. Agreed. When the new functionality in PEP 342 arrives, most of the generator tricks in nanothreads.py will become redundant. -Sw.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4