On Mon, 2005-08-22 at 12:16, "Martin v. Löwis" wrote: > Barry Warsaw wrote: > > I think technically, the answer to that is "yes", you will automatically > > get access to the source repo. > > At the moment, the answer actually is "no". For the projects repository, > there is no group write permission - you must be pythondev in order to > write. Good! I think that's a feature. :) I have a vague discomfort with allowing both types of access. I.e. I'd rather all source committers use the same mechanism. > > 2) when we finally get email > > notifications worked in, will it still look like your commit is coming > > from the right place. > > Not sure what "the right place" would be: pythondev at python.org? > I think the email could look any way we want it to look. I think it should be <username>@python.org where <username> is the firstname.lastname (with some exceptions) scheme that we've agreed on. I actually /don't/ want all commits to look like they're coming from pythondev at python.org > > and to support different certs for svn.python.org and > > (eventually) www.python.org. > > Ah. I think anonymous read access should be on port 80. Maybe we want to put websvn (or whatever it's called these days) on port 80 of svn.python.org? -Barry -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 307 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part Url : http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20050822/cb31d290/attachment.pgp
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4