[Martin v. Löwis] > Ah, ok. Of course, Barry can only speak about the current availability > of volunteers, which is quite good (especially since amk took over > coordinating them), nobody can predict the future (the time machine > apparently only works one-way). So I guess the concern stays, and, > more objectively, this is a risk for the project (but so is any > specific commercial offering). I'm not really worried about it. Sounds like ongoing pain is pretty much limited to keeping committer accounts/credentials up to date, and that normal good backup procedures will deal with filesystem-SVN state as a matter of course. If there's one thing sysadmins love to do, it's fiddling with user accounts and credentials -- if _anyone_ volunteers to work on python.org, they'll be eager to lord this power over us <wink>. If not, that's fine too. The PSF has the funds and the mission to pay for infrastructure support; I'd just _rather_ spend PSF funds on "more glamorous" stuff (like grants and conferences).
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4