RetroSearch Browse

Sat Aug 13 06:51:26 CEST 2005 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2005-August/055364.html

On Fri, Aug 12, 2005, David Goodger wrote:
>
> Barry Warsaw and I, the PEP editors, have been discussing the
> need for a new PEP type lately.  Martin von L?wis' PEP 347 was
> a prime example of a PEP that didn't fit into the existing
> Standards Track and Informational categories.  We agreed upon a
> new "Process" PEP type.  For more information, please see PEP 1
> (http://www.python.org/peps/pep-0001.html) -- the type of which has
> also been changed to Process.

Go ahead and make PEP 6 a Process PEP.
-- 
Aahz (aahz at pythoncraft.com)           <*>         http://www.pythoncraft.com/

The way to build large Python applications is to componentize and
loosely-couple the hell out of everything.

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2005-August/055364.html below:

[Python-Dev] new PEP type: Process