RetroSearch Browse

Tue Aug 9 08:52:01 CEST 2005 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2005-August/055298.html

Ilya Sandler wrote:
> So, would implementing gdb's "until" command instead of "next N" be a
> better idea? In its simplest form (without arguments) "until" advances to
> the next (textually) source line... This would solve the original problem of
>  getting over list comprehensions...

I like that idea.

> There is a bit of a problem with abbreviation of "until": gdb abbreviates
> it as "u", while in pdb "u" means "up"...It might be a good idea to have the
> same abbreviations

Indeed. I don't know much about pdb internals, but I think "u" should
become unbound, and "up" and "unt" should become the shortest
abbreviations.

Regards,
Martin

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2005-August/055298.html below:

should next command be extended?