RetroSearch Browse

Tue Aug 9 05:13:41 CEST 2005 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2005-August/055291.html

> At OSCON, Anthony Baxter made the point that pdb is currently one of the
> more unPythonic modules.

What is unpythonic about pdb? Is this part of Anthony's presentation
online? (Google found a summary and slides from presentation but they
don't say anything about pdb's deficiencies)

Ilya

On Mon, 8 Aug 2005, Aahz wrote:

> On Sun, Aug 07, 2005, Ilya Sandler wrote:
> >
> > Solution:
> >
> > Should pdb's next command accept an optional numeric argument? It would
> > specify how many actual lines of code (not "line events")
> > should  be skipped in the current frame before stopping,
>
> At OSCON, Anthony Baxter made the point that pdb is currently one of the
> more unPythonic modules.  If you're feeling a lot of energy about this,
> rewriting pdb might be more productive.
> --
> Aahz (aahz at pythoncraft.com)           <*>         http://www.pythoncraft.com/
>
> The way to build large Python applications is to componentize and
> loosely-couple the hell out of everything.
>

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2005-August/055291.html below:

[Python-Dev] pdb: should next command be extended?