A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2005-August/055261.html below:

[Python-Dev] pdb: should next command be extended?

[Python-Dev] pdb: should next command be extended? [Python-Dev] pdb: should next command be extended?Aahz aahz at pythoncraft.com
Mon Aug 8 17:45:03 CEST 2005
On Sun, Aug 07, 2005, Ilya Sandler wrote:
>
> Solution:
> 
> Should pdb's next command accept an optional numeric argument? It would
> specify how many actual lines of code (not "line events")
> should  be skipped in the current frame before stopping,

At OSCON, Anthony Baxter made the point that pdb is currently one of the
more unPythonic modules.  If you're feeling a lot of energy about this,
rewriting pdb might be more productive.
-- 
Aahz (aahz at pythoncraft.com)           <*>         http://www.pythoncraft.com/

The way to build large Python applications is to componentize and
loosely-couple the hell out of everything.
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4