Stephen J. Turnbull wrote: > If you mean the UTF-8 support in Terminal, it's no better or worse > than the EUC-JP support. The problem is that most Japanese Unix > systems continue to default to EUC-JP, and many Windows hosts > (including Samba file systems) default to Shift JIS. So people using > Terminal tend to set it to match the default remote environment (few > of them use shells on the Mac). Right: that might be the biggest problem. ls(1) would not display the file names of the remote servers in any readable way. Thanks for the confirmation. Regards, Martin
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4