Michiel De Hoon wrote: > Speaking of the five-patch-review-rule, about two months ago I reviewed five > patches and posted a summary here in order to push patch #1049855. This patch > is still waiting for a verdict (this is also my own fault, since I needed > several iterations to get this patch straightened out; my apologies for > that). Is there anything else I can do for this patch? Sorry, I missed that message. I now reviewed the patch, but at the moment, I see little chance that the suggested feature is implementable, except by using code that is specific to each stdio implementation. Regards, Martin
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4