RetroSearch Browse

Sat Aug 6 22:31:21 CEST 2005 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2005-August/055194.html

> PEP: 349
> Title: Generalised String Coercion
...
> Rationale
>    Python has had a Unicode string type for some time now but use of
>    it is not yet widespread.  There is a large amount of Python code
>    that assumes that string data is represented as str instances.
>    The long term plan for Python is to phase out the str type and use
>    unicode for all string data.

This PEP strikes me as premature, as putting the toy wagon before the 
horse, since it is premised on a major change to Python, possibly the most 
disruptive and controversial ever, being a done deal.  However there is, as 
far as I could find no PEP on Making Strings be Unicode, let alone a 
discussed, debated, and finalized PEP on the subject.

>   Clearly, a smooth migration path must be provided.

Of course.  But the path depends on the detailed final target, which has 
not, as far as I know, has been finalized, and certainly not in the needed 
PEP.  Your proposal might be part of the transition section of such a PEP 
or of a separate migration path PEP.

Terry J. Reedy

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2005-August/055194.html below:

[Python-Dev] Generalised String Coercion