Brett Cannon <bcannon at gmail.com> wrote: > On 8/4/05, Guido van Rossum <gvanrossum at gmail.com> wrote: > > I just realized that keeping RuntimeError still does not resolve the > issue that the name kind of sucks for realizing intrinsically that it > is for quick-and-dirty exceptions (or am I the only one who thinks > this?). Should we toss in a subclass called SimpleError? Much Python code I've looked at uses ValueError for this purpose. Would adding a special exception add much utility? Charles -- ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Charles Cazabon <python at discworld.dyndns.org> GPL'ed software available at: http://pyropus.ca/software/ -----------------------------------------------------------------------
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4