Willem Broekema <metawilm at gmail.com> writes:
> I realize it's major work to add recovery features to the CPython
> interpreter, so I don't think CPython will have anything like it soon
> and therefore also Python-the-language will not. Instead, my reason
> for mentioning this is to get the _concept_ of recoveries across. I
> think including (hypothetical, for now) recovery features in a
> discussion about exceptions is valuable, because that influences
> whether one thinks a label like "critical" for an exception is
> appropriate.
Heh, I talked about this at EuroPython...
http://starship.python.net/crew/mwh/recexc.pdf
The technical barriers are insignificant, really.
Cheers,
mwh
--
Our Constitution never promised us a good or efficient government,
just a representative one. And that's what we got.
-- http://www.advogato.org/person/mrorganic/diary.html?start=109
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4