A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2005-April/053109.html below:

[Python-Dev] PEP 340 - possible new name for block-statement

[Python-Dev] PEP 340 - possible new name for block-statement [Python-Dev] PEP 340 - possible new name for block-statementGuido van Rossum gvanrossum at gmail.com
Fri Apr 29 00:55:03 CEST 2005
How about, instead of trying to emphasize how different a
block-statement is from a for-loop, we emphasize their similarity?

A regular old loop over a sequence or iterable is written as:

    for VAR in EXPR:
        BLOCK

A variation on this with somewhat different semantics swaps the keywords:

    in EXPR for VAR:
        BLOCK

If you don't need the variable, you can leave the "for VAR" part out:

    in EXPR:
        BLOCK

Too cute? :-)

-- 
--Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4