Greg Ewing wrote: > Guido van Rossum wrote: > >> And surely you exaggerate. How about this then: >> >> The with-statement is similar to the for-loop. Until you've >> learned about the differences in detail, the only time you should >> write a with-statement is when the documentation for the function >> you are calling says you should. > > > I think perhaps I'm not expressing myself very well. > What I'm after is a high-level explanation that actually > tells people something useful, and *doesn't* cop out by > just saying "you're not experienced enough to understand > this yet". > this makes sense to me, also because a new control statement will not be usually as hidden as metaclasses and some other possibly obscure corners can be. OTOH I have the impression that the new toy is too shiny to have a lucid discussion whether it could have sharp edges or produce dizziness for the unexperienced.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4