Tim Delaney wrote: > Also, within a for-loop or block-statement, we could have ``raise > <exception>`` be equivalent to:: > > arg = <exception> > continue For this to work, builtin next() would need to be a bit smarter ... specifically, for an old-style iterator, any non-Iteration exception would need to be re-raised there. Tim Delaney
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4