Paul Svensson wrote: > You're not mentioning scopes of local variables, which seems to be > the issue where most of the previous proposals lose their balance > between hairy and pointless... My syntax is just sugar for nested defs. I assumed the scopes of local variables would be identical when using either syntax. Do you have any pointers to that go into the issues I'm probably missing? Thanks. -- Jason
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4