On Apr 26, 2005, at 1:12 AM, Greg Ewing wrote: > Bob Ippolito wrote: >> A few weeks ago I put together a patch to site.py for Python 2.5 >> <http://python.org/sf/1174614> that solves three major deficiencies: > > > > [concerning .pth files] > > While we're on the subject of .pth files, what about > the idea of scanning the directory containing the main > .py file for .pth files? This would make it easier to > have collections of Python programs sharing a common > set of modules, without having to either install them > system-wide or write hairy sys.path-manipulating code > or use platform-dependent symlink or PATH hacks. I don't think I'd ever use that, but it doesn't sound like a terrible idea. -bob
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4