On 25 apr 2005, at 16.14, Terry Reedy wrote:
> with <target> as <value>:
>
> would parallel the for-statement header and read smoother to me.
>
> for <target> as <value>:
>
> would not need new keyword, but would require close reading to
> distinguish
> 'as' from 'in'.
But it also moves the value to the right, removing focus. Wouldn't
"from"
be a good keyword to overload here?
"in"/"with"/"for"/"" <value> from <target>:
<BODY>
//Simon
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4