Guido van Rossum <gvanrossum at gmail.com> wrote:
> > In case my point about the difference between thunks and other
> > callables (specifically decorators) slipped by, consider the
> > documentation for staticmethod, which takes a callable. All the
> > staticmethod documentation says about that callable's parameters is:
> > "A static method does not receive an implicit first argument"
> > Pretty simple I'd say. Or classmethod:
> > "A class method receives the class as implicit first argument,
> > just like an instance method receives the instance."
> > Again, pretty simple. Why are these simple? Because decorators
> > generally pass on pretty much the same arguments as the callables they
> > wrap. My point was just that because thunks don't wrap other normal
> > callables, they can't make such abbreviations.
>
> You've got the special-casing backwards. It's not thinks that are
> special, but staticmethod (and decorators in general) because they
> take *any* callable. That's unusual -- most callable arguments have a
> definite signature, think of map(), filter(), sort() and Button
> callbacks.
Yeah, that was why I footnoted that most of my use for callables
taking callables was decorators. But while I don't use map, filter or
Button callbacks, I am guilty of using sort and helping to add a key=
argument to min and max, so I guess I can't be too serious about only
using decorators. ;-)
STeVe
--
You can wordify anything if you just verb it.
--- Bucky Katt, Get Fuzzy
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4