Fredrik Lundh wrote: >>Regardless, I believe that solving generator finalization (calling all >>enclosing finally blocks in the generator) is a worthwhile problem to >>solve. Whether that be by PEP 325, 288, 325+288, etc., that should be >>discussed. Whether people use it as a pseudo-block, or decide that >>blocks are further worthwhile, I suppose we could wait and see. >> >> > >Agreed. > > > I agree, in fact I think that solving that issue is very important before/if ever introducing a generalized block statement because otherwise things that would naturally be expressible with for and generators will use the block construct which allow more variety and so possibly less immediate clarity just because generators are not good at resource handling.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4