Shannon -jj Behrens wrote:
> Have you guys considered the following syntax for anonymous blocks? I
> think it's possible to parse given Python's existing syntax:
>
> items.doFoo(
> def (a, b) {
> return a + b
> },
> def (c, d) {
> return c + d
> }
> )
>
There was a proposal in the last few days on comp.lang.python that allows
you to do this in a way that requires less drastic changes to python's
syntax. See the thread "pre-PEP: Suite-Based Keywords" (shamless plug)
(an earlier, similar proposal is here:
http://groups.google.co.uk/groups?selm=mailman.403.1105274631.22381.python-list
%40python.org ).
In short, if doFoo is defined like:
def doFoo(func1, func2):
pass
You would be able to call it like:
doFoo(**):
def func1(a, b):
return a + b
def func2(c, d):
return c + d
That is, a suite can be used to define keyword arguments.
-Brian
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4