(I apologize that this is my first post. Please don't flame me into
oblivion or think I'm a quack!)
Have you guys considered the following syntax for anonymous blocks? I
think it's possible to parse given Python's existing syntax:
items.doFoo(
def (a, b) {
return a + b
},
def (c, d) {
return c + d
}
)
Notice the trick is that there is no name between the def and the "(",
and the ")" is followed by a "{".
I understand that there is hesitance to use "{}". However, you can
think of this as a Python special case on the same level as using ";"
between statements on a single line. From that perspective, it's not
inconsistent at all.
Best Regards,
-jj
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4