A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2005-April/052668.html below:

[Python-Dev] Unified or context diffs?

[Python-Dev] Unified or context diffs? [Python-Dev] Unified or context diffs?Anthony Baxter anthony at interlink.com.au
Thu Apr 14 05:17:54 CEST 2005
On Thursday 14 April 2005 07:26, Brett C. wrote:
> OK, it seems like everyone who cares enough to speak up has said so far
> that unified diffs are better I will change the docs some time between now
> and when I keel over dead to have people use unified diffs assuming some
> rush of people don't suddenly start saying they prefer contextual diffs.

Should probably say either context or unified diffs - I'm sure there's vendor
supplied 'diff' programs out there that don't support -u 

ed-style patches, of course, are RIGHT OUT. 

Anthony

-- 
Anthony Baxter     <anthony at interlink.com.au>
It's never too late to have a happy childhood.
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4