On Thursday 14 April 2005 07:26, Brett C. wrote: > OK, it seems like everyone who cares enough to speak up has said so far > that unified diffs are better I will change the docs some time between now > and when I keel over dead to have people use unified diffs assuming some > rush of people don't suddenly start saying they prefer contextual diffs. Should probably say either context or unified diffs - I'm sure there's vendor supplied 'diff' programs out there that don't support -u ed-style patches, of course, are RIGHT OUT. Anthony -- Anthony Baxter <anthony at interlink.com.au> It's never too late to have a happy childhood.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4