A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2005-April/052665.html below:

[Python-Dev] Unified or context diffs?

[Python-Dev] Unified or context diffs? [Python-Dev] Unified or context diffs?Michael Hudson mwh at python.net
Wed Apr 13 12:06:13 CEST 2005
Nick Coghlan <ncoghlan at iinet.net.au> writes:

> Are context diffs still favoured for patches?

If you want me to review it, yes, probably, but see below...

> The patch submission guidelines [1] still say that, but is it actually
> true these days? I personally prefer unified diffs, but have been
> generating context diffs because of what the guidelines say.

Emacs 21's diff-mode can convert between the two with a keypress.
People who continue to abuse themselves by not using Emacs can
probably find other tools to do this job.  So *I* don't regard this as
a big deal.

Plain diffs are of course, right out.

Cheers,
mwh

-- 
  It is never worth a first class man's time to express a majority
  opinion.  By definition, there are plenty of others to do that.
                                                        -- G. H. Hardy
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4