A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2005-April/052621.html below:

[Python-Dev] threading (GilState) question

[Python-Dev] threading (GilState) question [Python-Dev] threading (GilState) questionMichael Hudson mwh at python.net
Sun Apr 10 17:22:15 CEST 2005
Bob Ippolito <bob at redivi.com> writes:

> Is there a good reason to *not* call PyEval_InitThreads when using a
> threaded Python?

Well, it depends how expensive ones OS's locking primitives are, I
think.  There were some numbers posted to the twisted list recently
that showed it didn't make a whole lot of difference on some platform
or other... I don't have the knowledge or the courage to make that
call.

> Sounds like it would just be easier to implicitly call it during
> Py_Initialize some day.

That might indeed be simpler.

Cheers,
mwh

-- 
  The gripping hand is really that there are morons everywhere, it's
  just that the Americon morons are funnier than average.
                              -- Pim van Riezen, alt.sysadmin.recovery
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4