A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2005-April/052619.html below:

[Python-Dev] Security capabilities in Python

[Python-Dev] Security capabilities in Python [Python-Dev] Security capabilities in PythonKa-Ping Yee python-dev at zesty.ca
Sun Apr 10 00:34:12 CEST 2005
On Sat, 9 Apr 2005, James Y Knight wrote:
> You can protect against this, too, but it does show that it's *really*
> hard to get restricting code right...

Good point.  If you can't trust ==, then you're hosed.

> I'm of the opinion that it's not
> really worth it -- you should just use OS protections.

This i disagree with, however.  OS protections are a few orders of
magnitude more heavyweight and vastly more error-prone than using a
language with simple, clear semantics.

Predictable code behaviour is good.


-- ?!ng
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4