Nick Coghlan wrote: > Irmen de Jong wrote: > >> I just added a new bug on SF (1175396) and because I think >> that it is related to other bugs that were assigned to >> Walter Doerwald, I assigned this new bug directly to Walter too. >> >> Is that good practice or does someone else usually assign SF bugs to >> people? > > > I've certainly done that a few times myself - I figure that even if I > get it wrong, the recipient will either pass it on to a more appropriate > person, or simply revert it back to unassigned. Ah, okay. > I usually try to put in a comment to say *why* I've assigned it the way > I have, though. Picking an assignee at random should probably be > discouraged, but if there is someone that makes sense, then I don't see > a problem with asking them to look at it directly. Yep, that's what I've done. In my bug report (about codecs.readline) I referenced the two other bugs related to it (those were assigned to Walter). Thanks, Irmen.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4