A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2005-April/052506.html below:

[Python-Dev] New bug, directly assigned, okay?

[Python-Dev] New bug, directly assigned, okay?Nick Coghlan ncoghlan at iinet.net.au
Sat Apr 2 17:57:14 CEST 2005
Irmen de Jong wrote:
> I just added a new bug on SF (1175396) and because I think
> that it is related to other bugs that were assigned to
> Walter Doerwald, I assigned this new bug directly to Walter too.
> 
> Is that good practice or does someone else usually assign SF bugs to people?

I've certainly done that a few times myself - I figure that even if I get it 
wrong, the recipient will either pass it on to a more appropriate person, or 
simply revert it back to unassigned.

I usually try to put in a comment to say *why* I've assigned it the way I have, 
though. Picking an assignee at random should probably be discouraged, but if 
there is someone that makes sense, then I don't see a problem with asking them 
to look at it directly.

Cheers,
Nick.

-- 
Nick Coghlan   |   ncoghlan at email.com   |   Brisbane, Australia
---------------------------------------------------------------
             http://boredomandlaziness.skystorm.net
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4