Hi Bob, On Mon, Sep 27, 2004 at 04:21:03PM -0400, Bob Ippolito wrote: > file(path).read() is never really a good idea in the general case - > especially for a device node. > In other words, it sounds like the test should be fixed, not the > implementation. Sounds good. Does anyone object to the following patch? Index: test_os.py =================================================================== RCS file: /cvsroot/python/python/dist/src/Lib/test/test_os.py,v retrieving revision 1.27 diff -c -r1.27 test_os.py *** test_os.py 29 Aug 2004 18:47:31 -0000 1.27 --- test_os.py 28 Sep 2004 09:42:26 -0000 *************** *** 340,346 **** f.write('hello') f.close() f = file(os.devnull, 'r') ! self.assertEqual(f.read(), '') f.close() class URandomTests (unittest.TestCase): --- 340,351 ---- f.write('hello') f.close() f = file(os.devnull, 'r') ! self.assertEqual(f.read(1), '') ! self.assertEqual(f.read(10), '') ! self.assertEqual(f.read(100), '') ! self.assertEqual(f.read(1000), '') ! self.assertEqual(f.read(10000), '') ! self.assertEqual(f.read(100000), '') f.close() class URandomTests (unittest.TestCase): -+- Armin
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4