Anthony Baxter wrote: > >> +1 on the -m command-line variation, with the following change: >> >> I'd like Python to import the module and then run it's main function. >> >> I've been meaning to suggest smething like this myself. > > > I'd prefer it import the module, with __name__ == "__main__", > because it's compatible with what we do now for a module that's > also a script. But I like the idea, nonetheless. > > Question: should python -m foo.bar.baz work? I'd say "yes". Me too. Jim -- Jim Fulton mailto:jim at zope.com Python Powered! CTO (540) 361-1714 http://www.python.org Zope Corporation http://www.zope.com http://www.zope.org
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4