RetroSearch Browse

Wed Sep 22 00:16:08 CEST 2004 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2004-September/049048.html

Hi there,

There are two alternative patches provided to add a single extra API
item for this package, which would allow developers the ability to
extend the logging package to a certain extent without clobbering each
other's work.

At present, it isn't possible for a package to customise the
logging.Logger class, without running the risk of having it's changes
clobbered by an application using the package, or another package.

This small change allows each customiser to inherit changes from the
last customiser. Any chance of getting one of these solutions in for
2.4?

the "loggerClass" option provides more respectable declaration syntax,
but the "getLoggerclass" option provides symmetry.

http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1032206&group_id=5470&atid=305470

Thanks,

David.

-- 
The next great adventure of mankind is not for people who ask,
"What exactly is the point?" They will never get it.
    -- http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/3302375.stm

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2004-September/049048.html below:

[Python-Dev] [Patch 1032206] Add API to logging package to allow intercooperation.