At 02:35 PM 9/15/04 +0100, Michael Hudson wrote: >"Phillip J. Eby" <pje at telecommunity.com> writes: > > > When I say AST, I just mean "some kind of syntax representation", not > > necessarily the 'parser' module's current AST implementation. > >That ... thing ... isn't an AST in any sense of the word. > >I know the documentation and the method names (used to) suggest it is, >but that doesn't make it true :) Well, it's definitely syntax and it's definitely a tree, so it's at least an ST. :)
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4