Have you actually tested it, cus I made my own fix than was at least and additional 7 lines.... David. On Tue, 14 Sep 2004, Skip Montanaro wrote: > > David> As the link below shows httplib can't handle an IPv6 address, it > David> checks for a port number by checking for a : but this simply cuts > David> the IPv6 address in two and tries to set the port variable as > David> nonsense. > > David> http://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81926#c2 > > David> Are there any plans to rectify this, or even an alternative > David> version of httplib kicking about that can handle IPv6. > > I just checked in a fix for this (it was a one-character change, not > including unit test update). I don't know if there is a Python bug report > open which now needs to be closed. Considering the ease of the fix, I sort > of think not (otherwise it would have been fixed long ago). Note that in > general we have plenty of other things to do with our time without > monitoring other projects' bug trackers looking for possible Python bug > reports. If they aren't reported on SF we won't here about them. (The > Debian folks routinely open SF items when Python bug reports wind up in the > Debian tracker.) > > -- > Skip Montanaro > Got spam? http://www.spambayes.org/ > skip at pobox.com >
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4