Barry Warsaw wrote: > On Mon, 2004-09-13 at 12:18, Erik Heneryd wrote: >>BTW, what about a closing delimiter in the standard regex? > > > There isn't one. The PEP explains the rationale. Sorry, must've missed it? Note that I'm not saying there should be a default closer, but an empty group in the regex, for subclasses to fill in (for example ml entities could use this). >>I hope you don't do pep-292 just to fill your own needs (i18n?), but >>also keep your mind open to other uses... > > > What can't you do with PEP 292 as it now stands? Examples from previous posts: sh-style safe variables, ml entities. As you really can't reuse anything now, it would be like starting from scratch. Erik
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4