M.-A. Lemburg wrote: >> (google for "stringlib" for some work I'm doing in this area) > > Ah, now I know where you're coming from :-) Shift tables > don't work well in the Unicode world with its large alphabet. since most real-life text use characters from only a small number of regions in that alphabet, compressed shift tables work extremely well (the algorithm on the stringlib page shows one way to do that, in constant space and O(m) time). > BTW, you might want to look at the BMS implementation I did > for mxTextTools. did you ever get around to add Unicode support to mxTextTools ? </F>
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4